Distribution of Confinements
Many communities and families in rural places have been adversely affected by contaminated groundwater, depleted sources of fresh water, impaired air quality, and have experienced other burdensome health effects due to the impacts of fracking. In addition to potential harm to drinking water and air quality, the community disruption that comes along with the process can severely impact vulnerable communities.
Communities of color are more likely to have fracking leases in their neighborhoods, exposing them to noise pollution, constant light and social disruption, as well as water and air quality problems. Werder (2013)
Fracking “Solutions” Often Fail Communities While the fracking industry claims that modern practices make extraction safer, many of these measures fall short. For example, the cement casing around fracking wells often fails, allowing toxic chemicals to leak into groundwater. Moreover, the disposal of wastewater from fracking presents additional challenges, as it is often injected deep underground, increasing the risk of earthquakes. These issues underscore the need for stronger, more comprehensive regulations.
Concentration of the Profits
Preferentially selecting communities of color and low wealth for fracking operations puts an undue burden of exposure and adverse health outcomes on vulnerable groups, prioritizing corporate profit over the health of North Carolinians. Those who benefit from fracking are very far removed from the communities of color and low wealth that will be most negatively impacted by this industry. Werder (2013)
Ways Forward
Stricter Regulations
Ban on New Wells in Vulnerable Areas
Improved Wastewater Management
Transparency and Accountability
Require fracking companies to disclose the chemicals used in their operations and make them fully accountable for any environmental or public health damages.
Â
